2026-07-28: itd-102 spec minted as spc-16 (fourth live iss-80 instance this run); renumbered to spc-19 by hand.

Frontmatter

.abcd/work/decisions/dcn-2607280000000005-itd-102-spec-minted-as-spc-16-fourth.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗

mentions4

• iss-80Record id allocators (itd-N, spc-N, iss-N) are branch-local: parallel agents on separate branches each scan for max+1 and mint the SAME id. Two intents both claimed itd-82 and both merged to main (PRs #46, #47). The iss-N allocator hit the same class before (iss-77 collision, manually renumbered to iss-79; class recorded as iss-74). Resolving a collision forces a renumber, which breaks the record's stated 'ids are capture-stable, never renumbered' invariant -- so the minting scheme, not the renumber, is the defect. This capture is the MINTING half: a collision-free allocation scheme is needed (forge-minted / random-suffix / timestamp / reserve-registry -- SOTA under research). The DETECTION half is armed separately: intent_lifecycle now blocks duplicate intent ids.
• itd-102**Your repo says the same thing about itself everywhere — because abcd asked you once and holds every surface to it.** A project's positioning fragments silently: the README strapline, the package or plugin manifest description, and the agent conventions file are each edited at different moments, and soon three surfaces tell three stories about what the project is. When abcd prepares a repo it interviews the user for the project's identity — title, tagline, and a short elevator pitch — and records the answers in one canonical home in the development record. Every surface rendering derives from that home, and a deterministic positioning check compares the surfaces against it on every audit: a mismatch is highlighted with the exact drifted line, and the fix is either re-render from the record or a deliberate, recorded identity change — never a silent extra variant, and never a silent rewrite by abcd. "I changed my tagline once, in one place, and abcd chased it everywhere else," said Alice, a solo founder. "When a stray edit crept into the README, the next audit pointed at the exact line instead of letting the drift settle in."
• spc-16abcd-teaches-repo-agents-the-shell-commands-they-must-never
• spc-19your-repo-says-the-same-thing-about-itself-everywhere-becaus