Development record
2026-08-22 — SOTA research protocol captured, no /abcd:research verb minted
2026-08-22 — SOTA research protocol captured, no /abcd:research verb minted (session assessment; adoption is the maintainer's gate). Three research runs (context-window management ×2 passes, local MLX models) followed the same shape — parallel research pass, dated *-sota.md synthesis with per-technique fit challenges, lint gates, fresh-context adversarial reviewers with disjoint lenses (source fidelity / repo fidelity), every finding applied. Assessment: /abcd:ideate does NOT cover SOTA research (idea-with-verdict vs question-with-survey; a survey is ideate's leg-1 feeder, not its overlap); /abcd:consult + /abcd:ingest cover the sources-corpus side; execution stays host-delegated. Rejected alternative: minting a research-record validator verb now — fails script-first-mvp (thin genre corpus, tier vocabulary still moving). Protocol + revisit condition recorded in .abcd/development/research/notes/2026-08-22-sota-research-protocol.md.
Frontmatter
| id | dcn-2608220000000011 |
|---|---|
| type | decision |
| date | 2026-08-22 |
.abcd/work/decisions/dcn-2608220000000011-sota-research-protocol-captured-no-abcd.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2608230748418054Ideate leg-2 grill has a structural blind spot for id-less records: the 2026-08-23 abcd-research-verb run's grill failed to surface the same-day research note (2026-08-22-sota-research-protocol.md) that answers the submitted idea by name, because research notes carry no citable record id and the grill's output is id-cited hits. The nearest-citable-record note-field rule exists but nothing prompts a sweep of research/notes/ or DECISIONS.md, so a standing verdict recorded outside the id-bearing record families is invisible to the leg that exists to prevent re-litigation. The leg-3 evaluator caught it only by doing its own sweep.