Development record
2026-08-23 — SOTA-protocol proposal adversarially reviewed (two fresh-context
2026-08-23 — SOTA-protocol proposal adversarially reviewed (two fresh-context reviewers, disjoint lenses, authorship stripped): verdict REFRAME — the no-verb deferral stands, but on script-first-mvp's actual trigger (contract uncertainty) alone. Withdrawn: the thin-corpus argument (the genre corpus is ~13 notes, and ideate's own validator was minted after three manual runs, so corpus size is not the criterion). Repaired: reviewer yields reclassified as session testimony; feeder claim downgraded to expectation (no ideate run has consumed a *-sota.md note yet); protocol gains step 6 — every survey note records its review verdicts inline, without which the revisit condition is undetectable. Repairs applied to the protocol note and both survey notes.
Frontmatter
| id | dcn-2608230000000002 |
|---|---|
| type | decision |
| date | 2026-08-23 |
.abcd/work/decisions/dcn-2608230000000002-sota-protocol-proposal-adversarially.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2608230748418054Ideate leg-2 grill has a structural blind spot for id-less records: the 2026-08-23 abcd-research-verb run's grill failed to surface the same-day research note (2026-08-22-sota-research-protocol.md) that answers the submitted idea by name, because research notes carry no citable record id and the grill's output is id-cited hits. The nearest-citable-record note-field rule exists but nothing prompts a sweep of research/notes/ or DECISIONS.md, so a standing verdict recorded outside the id-bearing record families is invisible to the leg that exists to prevent re-litigation. The leg-3 evaluator caught it only by doing its own sweep.