Development record
2026-09-02 — On the supply-regime check, the 2026-09-01 maintainer ruling governs and the "stay in flag mode" entry of this day is superseded by it: the framework's section 8.9 names two structural signatures (aggregation at evaluative, fix-proposing at registrative) and a record-shape check at explicative, and those refuse, enforced; the four prose detectors were an addition the framework never asked for, proved noisy on synthetic evidence, and are withdrawn rather than left flagging. The property the case report claims is therefore enforced for the structural check and unclaimed for prose. No configuration seam is built; the wontfix on iss-2609012259571458 stands on this ground.
2026-09-02 — On the supply-regime check, the 2026-09-01 maintainer ruling governs and the "stay in flag mode" entry of this day is superseded by it: the framework's section 8.9 names two structural signatures (aggregation at evaluative, fix-proposing at registrative) and a record-shape check at explicative, and those refuse, enforced; the four prose detectors were an addition the framework never asked for, proved noisy on synthetic evidence, and are withdrawn rather than left flagging. The property the case report claims is therefore enforced for the structural check and unclaimed for prose. No configuration seam is built; the wontfix on iss-2609012259571458 stands on this ground.
Frontmatter
| id | dcn-2609020000000015 |
|---|---|
| type | decision |
| date | 2026-09-02 |
.abcd/work/decisions/dcn-2609020000000015-on-the-supply-regime-check-the.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2609012259571458The supply-regime check has a flag mode in code but no seam that can select it, so the design's degradation path cannot be taken