Development record

2026-10-02 — itd-2609301918174237 (a provider off this machine takes a file-reading agent only as a fixed, blanked, capped bundle) is filed as a draft pending its interview, under the product thinker's ruling DR5c-0 of 2026-10-02, as relayed by the orchestrator of autonomous run A: "BACK TO DRAFT, INTERVIEW LATER — moved back to drafts/, queued for two reviews + a full planning interview; nothing built from it meanwhile". Lane dr5bSpec of autonomous run A had written it as planned with a spec, without a planning interview; that spec was not filed (a parked copy stays in the local tier for the interview), the intent carries no kind, spec link, impact or scope-condition identities until the interview sets them, and nothing is built from it. Its Decisions section keeps the rulings DR5b-1 to DR5b-4 of 2026-09-30 verbatim and the lane's facilitator choices (its Decisions 5 to 9) as written, the latter open to the interview; DR5c-1 to DR5c-3 were not asked and fold into that interview (filed by lane dr5cRecords).