This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

2026-10-02 — The consistency pass follow-ups are planned as one intent (itd-2609291923559186, spc-2610021456200324, impact additive) after two adversarial reviews and a planning interview with the product thinker and technical facilitator, asked one at a time. Rulings: A3 stays in this intent, though iss-2609260926323349's body had routed it to the shipped itd-34; A4 stays and builds its own overflow signal; the pre-commit gate runs the rule checks on every commit and the model pass only where the owner's personal settings provide a route, marking it owed otherwise, and never refuses a commit on a judgement it could not obtain; what the gate does on a finding (warn, stop, or automatic: fix the obvious and file the rest) is asked at setup; the rule checks cover the whole corpus and the model pass covers the staged records and their links; the gate waits for the core-owned managed pre-commit gates (iss-84 with itd-62, ruling J23); G1 lands first; the new A1 codes are warnings, and the 136 one-way `builds_on` edges that exist when the rule lands are baselined, so only new ones are flagged. The 10 acceptance criteria are the product thinker's. Grounds: "pursued: contradictions get into the records unnoticed and are answered twice, and unattended runs write records with no one checking them for contradictions; wrong if, after it ships, the same contradiction is still filed twice, a rule-catchable one still gets in, or an unattended run still lands a contradiction the check covers."

decisiondcn-2610020000000002

2026-10-02 — The consistency pass follow-ups are planned as one intent (itd-2609291923559186, spc-2610021456200324, impact additive) after two adversarial reviews and a planning interview with the product thinker and technical facilitator, asked one at a time. Rulings: A3 stays in this intent, though iss-2609260926323349's body had routed it to the shipped itd-34; A4 stays and builds its own overflow signal; the pre-commit gate runs the rule checks on every commit and the model pass only where the owner's personal settings provide a route, marking it owed otherwise, and never refuses a commit on a judgement it could not obtain; what the gate does on a finding (warn, stop, or automatic: fix the obvious and file the rest) is asked at setup; the rule checks cover the whole corpus and the model pass covers the staged records and their links; the gate waits for the core-owned managed pre-commit gates (iss-84 with itd-62, ruling J23); G1 lands first; the new A1 codes are warnings, and the 136 one-way builds_on edges that exist when the rule lands are baselined, so only new ones are flagged. The 10 acceptance criteria are the product thinker's. Grounds: "pursued: contradictions get into the records unnoticed and are answered twice, and unattended runs write records with no one checking them for contradictions; wrong if, after it ships, the same contradiction is still filed twice, a rule-catchable one still gets in, or an unattended run still lands a contradiction the check covers."

Frontmatter

iddcn-2610020000000002
typedecision
date2026-10-02

mentions6