2026-10-02 — Ruling CB1 of the person as technical facilitator (2026-09-29, same interview and local-tier file as the DR3 entry above; recorded by lane rd2), verbatim: "transcript store owned by another uid: REFUSE EVERYTHING (reads included), as now; NOTE: the refusal wording should name the foreign owner, not use write wording." Built: every history verb, reads included, still refuses a records leaf another account owns, and the refusal names the owning uid (and the account name where it resolves) with no write wording on a read verb (`internal/core/history/location.go`; iss-2609291731336469, resolved by commit 3674db3a4).

Frontmatter

.abcd/work/decisions/dcn-2610020000000004-ruling-cb1-of-the-person-as-technical.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗

mentions1

• iss-2609291731336469The transcript store refuses every history verb, reads included, when its records leaf is owned by another uid, and says so with write wording: Resolve's owner check (internal/core/history/location.go:223) reports 'not owned by this account; refusing to write transcripts into it' even for history list. The realistic hit is a root container over a bind-mounted checkout with the local store declared, where reads and hook capture both refuse. Precedent runs both ways: rules/root.go and fsutil.go refuse foreign-owned reads, home.go admits a root-owned home. Fix-later shape from the review: on a foreign owner, skip the narrowing with a Note on a read and refuse only a write.