This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

2026-10-02 — Ruling H3-0 of the product thinker (2026-09-30, in the planning interview for the draft itd-2609091014076309 run by the run's interviewer abcd-a2 [75597f]; the answers are kept in the local-tier file `.abcd/.work.local/scratch/reports/planning-answers-2609-30.md` and restated here because that file is not committed; recorded by lane rd2). Put because the draft had no record of the two adversarial reviews the planning-interview prerequisite requires; the answer, verbatim: "REVIEWS FIRST, THEN INTERVIEW (two reviewers one after the other — design/feasibility, then record-discipline — findings applied or rejected in the draft, then the interview on the corrected text)." Applied: both reviews ran and their dispositions were applied before the interview, on branch plan/worktree-store-review, which is not on the default branch at this entry's base (the intent is still in drafts/ here).

decisiondcn-2610020000000009

2026-10-02 — Ruling H3-0 of the product thinker (2026-09-30, in the planning interview for the draft itd-2609091014076309 run by the run's interviewer abcd-a2 [75597f]; the answers are kept in the local-tier file .abcd/.work.local/scratch/reports/planning-answers-2609-30.md and restated here because that file is not committed; recorded by lane rd2). Put because the draft had no record of the two adversarial reviews the planning-interview prerequisite requires; the answer, verbatim: "REVIEWS FIRST, THEN INTERVIEW (two reviewers one after the other — design/feasibility, then record-discipline — findings applied or rejected in the draft, then the interview on the corrected text)." Applied: both reviews ran and their dispositions were applied before the interview, on branch plan/worktree-store-review, which is not on the default branch at this entry's base (the intent is still in drafts/ here).

Frontmatter

iddcn-2610020000000009
typedecision
date2026-10-02

mentions1