This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

2026-10-18 — While the person is away a question is routed by the act it asks about, not by its chip (facilitator-on-delegation, itd-2610180912189125 review round 1; supersedes the chip routing in dcn-2610180913431493): the guard still refuses every question on the host's question tool while the away mode holds, now with one reason whatever the chip. It tells the agent to queue with abcd mode queue, and carry on with other work, a question about any act only the person may approve: an approval the repository binds to the person per act (an embargo close's --approve digest, which commands/embargo.md says is never supplied unless the person has read the text and said yes in that session; a release sign-off); publishing anything or changing a repository's visibility; adding a dependency; a secret, a credential or an App; a step only a website or a browser can do; a destructive act (deleting what the session did not create, overwriting uncommitted work, a force push, discarding a peer's work); and anything that spends money. Every other question is decided and recorded with abcd decide, with its grounds and how to reverse it. The away mode, set on the person's word, is their ask for the session to commit and push its own branches and open their pull requests, which is the owed work itself; merging follows the repository's own rule. The Setup chip marks the setup interview's questions (visibility, keys, oracles), not a step only the person can take, so routing by chip would have sent an embargo approval, or the creation of a new App asked under a Product chip, to be decided by the agent (grounds: the plan review of 2026-10-18, finding 4; commands/embargo.md approval one per act; brief invariant 22; AGENTS.md new dependencies and commits; internal/surface/cli guard question chips)

decisiondcn-2610180937177502

2026-10-18 — While the person is away a question is routed by the act it asks about, not by its chip (facilitator-on-delegation, itd-2610180912189125 review round 1; supersedes the chip routing in dcn-2610180913431493): the guard still refuses every question on the host's question tool while the away mode holds, now with one reason whatever the chip. It tells the agent to queue with abcd mode queue, and carry on with other work, a question about any act only the person may approve: an approval the repository binds to the person per act (an embargo close's --approve digest, which commands/embargo.md says is never supplied unless the person has read the text and said yes in that session; a release sign-off); publishing anything or changing a repository's visibility; adding a dependency; a secret, a credential or an App; a step only a website or a browser can do; a destructive act (deleting what the session did not create, overwriting uncommitted work, a force push, discarding a peer's work); and anything that spends money. Every other question is decided and recorded with abcd decide, with its grounds and how to reverse it. The away mode, set on the person's word, is their ask for the session to commit and push its own branches and open their pull requests, which is the owed work itself; merging follows the repository's own rule. The Setup chip marks the setup interview's questions (visibility, keys, oracles), not a step only the person can take, so routing by chip would have sent an embargo approval, or the creation of a new App asked under a Product chip, to be decided by the agent (grounds: the plan review of 2026-10-18, finding 4; commands/embargo.md approval one per act; brief invariant 22; AGENTS.md new dependencies and commits; internal/surface/cli guard question chips)

Frontmatter

iddcn-2610180937177502
typedecision
date2026-10-18

mentions4