Development record

2026-10-30 — Decided by the technical facilitator on delegation (the product thinker's ruling of 2026-10-29 that embark's lesson ranking stays in the decision adapter intent as a real judgement; iss-2610262033055327 named that it has no host answer to pair), how embark's lesson ranking becomes a judgement, for step 2 of spc-2609221011151661 to build. (a) The judgement is one score question per lesson, on a scale of 0 to 4: how far does this lesson apply to the new voyage as its brief frames it. Its state is the brief's framing (bounded to fit the window) and the one lesson. A choose question over the lessons is not used, because a lesson is often longer than an option may be and the option set would grow with the lifeboat. (b) The host answers it: embark lessons lists each lesson's question in its result, the agent running the embark page scores them, and passes the scores back with a scores file; the lessons are then ranked by those scores, term overlap breaking ties. Without a scores file the result is today's term-overlap order, still named a heuristic, so no caller breaks. (c) The type routes like the drain's judgement: in shadow the adapter scores each lesson beside the host's answer and each pair is recorded in the newest lab home; turned on (only from the person's own machine file) the adapter's scores rank the lessons and no host scores are asked for; an adapter that cannot answer leaves the host's request standing with a fallback receipt. (d) With no brief, the lessons stay listed unranked, as today, and nothing is asked.