Development record
CONTEXT.md's surface_coverage sharp-edge says it reads only the command and skill surfaces; its sub-verb pass also reads the CLI command tree. The bullet says the agent, hook, and CLI-verb surfaces are not covered, but subverbs.go reads the committed surface.json command-tree snapshot and files findings under surface_coverage for surface-bearing verbs, including a reverse sweep. The staleness errs in the safe direction (understating enforcement) so it is low-risk, but CLI-verb surfaces are now partly covered; genuinely uncovered are the operator-internal verbs, bare CLI-only verbs, and all of Direction A. Fix: reword to name the sub-verb pass and the truly-uncovered set.
CONTEXT.md's surface_coverage sharp-edge says it reads only the command and skill surfaces; its sub-verb pass also reads the CLI command tree. The bullet says the agent, hook, and CLI-verb surfaces are not covered, but subverbs.go reads the committed surface.json command-tree snapshot and files findings under surface_coverage for surface-bearing verbs, including a reverse sweep. The staleness errs in the safe direction (understating enforcement) so it is low-risk, but CLI-verb surfaces are now partly covered; genuinely uncovered are the operator-internal verbs, bare CLI-only verbs, and all of Direction A. Fix: reword to name the sub-verb pass and the truly-uncovered set.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2608261041020419 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2608261041020419-context-surface-coverage-understates-cli.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- dcn-26082600000000012026-08-26 — bughunt round 7 (state #368): hardened the new issue-resolution