Development record
The session-1 lapse record explains the misread go-ahead as a homonym and thereby discloses a participant's first name; the filing's own 2026-08-29 decision line rules that roles, never names, appear in any record or commit. Found by the Phase 1 adversarial review; the text also reached the pushed filing branch, so the branch history carries it until the PR is squash-merged or the branch rewritten.
issueresolvedmajoriss-2608300114352100
The session-1 lapse record explains the misread go-ahead as a homonym and thereby discloses a participant's first name; the filing's own 2026-08-29 decision line rules that roles, never names, appear in any record or commit. Found by the Phase 1 adversarial review; the text also reached the pushed filing branch, so the branch history carries it until the PR is squash-merged or the branch rewritten.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2608300114352100 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | major |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2608300114352100-lapse-record-discloses-a-first-name.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- dcn-26083000000000112026-08-30 — Phase 1 adversarial review (ruthless-reviewer, fresh context) findings captured as iss-2608300114352100 (a first name disclosed through a homonym in the session-1 lapse record; the wording is replaced, and the pushed branch's history still carries it until the PR is squash-merged), iss-2608300114357633 (this log contradicting the branch, remedied by the two lines above), and iss-2608300114359543 (record consistency: one role name for the 2026-08-28 rulings, the ratified marker form in itd-143, the framing section statement-first, no adoption-date marker on invariant 15, the phase count, and "Phase 2 planning" reworded so it cannot read as roadmap Phase 2). All three resolved in the same change.