The decision log's last word on two questions is the opposite of what the filing branch does: it defers the brief-lifeboat mapping row to itd-143's build while the branch adds the row, and it records the roadmap phase home as deferred while the branch authors Phase 7 on a facilitator ruling that the log never records. Append-only, so the remedy is appended lines carrying both rulings.

Frontmatter

.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2608300114357633-decision-log-contradicts-the-filing.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗

mentions2

• dcn-26083000000000112026-08-30 — Phase 1 adversarial review (ruthless-reviewer, fresh context) findings captured as iss-2608300114352100 (a first name disclosed through a homonym in the session-1 lapse record; the wording is replaced, and the pushed branch's history still carries it until the PR is squash-merged), iss-2608300114357633 (this log contradicting the branch, remedied by the two lines above), and iss-2608300114359543 (record consistency: one role name for the 2026-08-28 rulings, the ratified marker form in itd-143, the framing section statement-first, no adoption-date marker on invariant 15, the phase count, and "Phase 2 planning" reworded so it cannot read as roadmap Phase 2). All three resolved in the same change.
• itd-143The brief gains a framing chapter under 01-product/ — the macro-why home: one section holds the project's framing, the why behind the why, and receives the brief-creation interview's committed framing products; the brief-lifeboat mapping gains the matching row so a lifeboat carries framing like any other section