Development record
A list-valued lapsed_at ([]) on a non-lapse record is lint-green because the record-shape check tests absence with isAbsentValue, which treats an empty inline list as absent, while capture's reader refuses it as not a string and skips the record silently. Same pre-existing class as found_at; the lapsed_at check should test nullness with the frontmatter null set only and let a list-shaped value fall through to the RFC 3339 finding.
issueresolvedminoriss-2608300224316569
A list-valued lapsed_at ([]) on a non-lapse record is lint-green because the record-shape check tests absence with isAbsentValue, which treats an empty inline list as absent, while capture's reader refuses it as not a string and skips the record silently. Same pre-existing class as found_at; the lapsed_at check should test nullness with the frontmatter null set only and let a list-shaped value fall through to the RFC 3339 finding.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2608300224316569 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2608300224316569-list-valued-lapsed-at-splits-the-gates.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2608301519255156the gate never judges schema_version's value so fifteen spellings the ledger reader refuses are lint-green