Development record

itd-180 second-round residue: spc-58 still says promote refuses a reading item only when the disposition directory is absent while the build refuses any standing state but accepted; lint.StandingDispositions is exported with no production caller (a single reader in the issueschema leaf would retire it); the three reading stores declare no required fields so the committed-tree gate never judges a reading or disposition's content, contrary to the reading package's header claim that the reader refuses what the writer refuses.