Development record
itd-181 review nits: the intent-auditor definition's frontmatter description still summarises the output without the disposition surface; the brief's intent surface page describes the audit ingest row as the per-criterion write only; the human dead-letter render omits the untested split the JSON reports; the staged-rollout test skips on an unreadable shipped directory where a fatal would be stricter.
issueresolvednitpickiss-2608300927241768
itd-181 review nits: the intent-auditor definition's frontmatter description still summarises the output without the disposition surface; the brief's intent surface page describes the audit ingest row as the per-criterion write only; the human dead-letter render omits the untested split the JSON reports; the staged-rollout test skips on an unreadable shipped directory where a fatal would be stricter.
Grounds
- pursued: each surface that states the audit's output names the scope-condition dispositions; a dead-letter render without the untested split, or a description or brief row that omits the dispositions, would show it wrong
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2608300927241768 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2608300927241768-itd-181-review-nits.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- itd-181A shipped intent's scope conditions are dispositioned by the fidelity verdict — what was assumed ex ante and what survived are recorded as different things