Development record
abcd capture's --source enum has no value for a security advisory (an external reviewer's finding on the forge) nor for a handover item (a NEXT.md or lab finding another session left for filing); the autonomous run used review-followup and agent-observation and stated the real origin in each body. Either the enum gains security-advisory and handover, or the surface page documents the mapping so every future run chooses the same values.
issueopenminoriss-2609020716571275
abcd capture's --source enum has no value for a security advisory (an external reviewer's finding on the forge) nor for a handover item (a NEXT.md or lab finding another session left for filing); the autonomous run used review-followup and agent-observation and stated the real origin in each body. Either the enum gains security-advisory and handover, or the surface page documents the mapping so every future run chooses the same values.
Remedy grounds (2026-09-29)
- The list lives once in internal/core/issueschema/issueschema.go:180-187, so either answer is one edit there or one table beside the flag's documentation, never a second vocabulary.
- Rejected: deciding the vocabulary here, which is the product thinker's ruling; the sibling record carries the same fork for autonomous-hunt and is ruled with it.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2609020716571275 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2609020716571275-abcd-capture-s-source-enum-has-no-value.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗