This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The readings companion's section 4.3 says what a disposition's grounds must contain varies by state (a rejection names the purpose protected, an admission or a decline states why) and that the variation is a lint rule rather than four fields. Nothing enforces it: the disposition command refuses only a blank or whitespace-only grounds field, and no lint reads the grounds against the state. Held by protocol today; the readiness statement for Phase A records it as not held by mechanism.

issuewontfixminoriss-2609021816039081

The readings companion's section 4.3 says what a disposition's grounds must contain varies by state (a rejection names the purpose protected, an admission or a decline states why) and that the variation is a lint rule rather than four fields. Nothing enforces it: the disposition command refuses only a blank or whitespace-only grounds field, and no lint reads the grounds against the state. Held by protocol today; the readiness statement for Phase A records it as not held by mechanism.

Grounds

  • declined: a state-keyed grounds lint would be a new refusal inside the parked gates; this would be wrong if the rethink of the reading work re-arms grounds refusals

Frontmatter

idiss-2609021816039081
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor