`abcd ideate record` prints "the idea does not graduate" for a `reframed` verdict, which reads as "killed" to the operator receiving it.

abcd ideate record prints "the idea does not graduate" for a reframed verdict, which reads as "killed" to the operator receiving it.

Observed recording an ideate verdict during an autonomous run in a managed repository. A reframed verdict is not a rejection: the idea survives in a different shape, and the whole point of recording it is that the reframing is the output. The message conflates it with the outcome where nothing survives, so an operator (or a downstream session reading the record) takes a reframed idea for a dead one.

Wanted: distinct wording per verdict — say what the reframing was, or at minimum "the idea does not graduate in its original shape; it was reframed" — so the terminal message matches the verdict the record carries. This is the only defect the run found in a set of record verbs that otherwise all worked, which is filed separately as a positive observation.

Grounds

• pursued: we expect a reframed verdict's terminal line to be distinguishable from a killed one's and to name the reframing; a reframed record whose next line reads as a rejection would show it wrong