Development record
itd-43 criterion 1 promises no live reference to epic as a standalone noun in abcd-owned files. One survives on the brief's intent surface page, .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:244 ('no epic currently owns it'), inside the fenced surface diagram opened at line 176, which GL002 skips by design as fenced text and a grep finds. Reword it to spec, or record that fenced diagrams are out of the sweep's scope. Found by the fidelity audit; not fixed here.
issueresolvedminoriss-2609231206207995
itd-43 criterion 1 promises no live reference to epic as a standalone noun in abcd-owned files. One survives on the brief's intent surface page, .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:244 ('no epic currently owns it'), inside the fenced surface diagram opened at line 176, which GL002 skips by design as fenced text and a grep finds. Reword it to spec, or record that fenced diagrams are out of the sweep's scope. Found by the fidelity audit; not fixed here.
Grounds
- pursued: the brief carries no live epic noun outside the glossary's forbidden_synonyms; shown wrong if a word-bounded grep of .abcd/development/brief outside glossary/ finds one
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2609231206207995 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2609231206207995-itd-43-criterion-1-promises-no-live.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- itd-43abcd Speaks One Word for a Specced Block of Work, and That Word Is "Spec"