`abcd spec close <spc-N> --remainder <slug> --impact <value>` is refused by design, because a remainder close ships nothing, and the refusal says to supply the impact at the close that ships. It does not say that the judgement can be kept now: `abcd intent plan <itd-N> --impact <value>` stamps the impact on an intent that is already planned, and the later close then needs no flag. In autonomous run A a lane that knew the impact at a remainder close dropped it, which left it to be remembered by whichever session makes the final close. Wanted: both remainder refusals in internal/core/intent/lifecycle.go name `abcd intent plan <itd-N> --impact <value>` as the way to record the judgement at once.

abcd spec close <spc-N> --remainder <slug> --impact <value> is refused by design, because a remainder close ships nothing, and the refusal says to supply the impact at the close that ships. It does not say that the judgement can be kept now: abcd intent plan <itd-N> --impact <value> stamps the impact on an intent that is already planned, and the later close then needs no flag. In autonomous run A a lane that knew the impact at a remainder close dropped it, which left it to be remembered by whichever session makes the final close. Wanted: both remainder refusals in internal/core/intent/lifecycle.go name abcd intent plan <itd-N> --impact <value> as the way to record the judgement at once.

Grounds

• pursued: we expect naming the plan route in the refusal to keep an impact a lane already knows from being dropped at a remainder close; it is shown wrong if a lane refused there still re-runs without recording the impact and the judgement is lost to the final close