itd-199's three scope-condition identity markers are wrapped in backticks in its shipped record, so the claim reader treats each as documentation of the marker grammar rather than an identity: ParseClaims reports zero conditions, the verdict dispositions keyed to cond-2608312031029678, cond-2608312031028702 and cond-2608312031020321 key to nothing the record carries, and abcd intent condition refuses to re-disposition cond-2608312031028702, the worked example its own spec names

itd-199's three scope-condition identity markers are wrapped in backticks in its shipped record, so the claim reader treats each as documentation of the marker grammar rather than an identity: ParseClaims reports zero conditions, the verdict dispositions keyed to cond-2608312031029678, cond-2608312031028702 and cond-2608312031020321 key to nothing the record carries, and abcd intent condition refuses to re-disposition cond-2608312031028702, the worked example its own spec names

Grounds

• pursued: we expect itd-199 to carry three readable condition identities; a read of intent condition itd-199 reporting fewer than three would show it wrong