The lint chapter's section 1.1 says prose_citation_resolves scans nine record stores and lists rdi, dsp, rdg, adm and srp as the non-citation stores, while .abcd/record-lint.json names ten under that rule: the reframe store rfm was added to the config and not to the sentence.

The lint chapter's section 1.1 says prose_citation_resolves scans nine record stores and lists rdi, dsp, rdg, adm and srp as the non-citation stores, while .abcd/record-lint.json names ten under that rule: the reframe store rfm was added to the config and not to the sentence.

Grounds

• pursued: the chapter's count and list agree with prose_citation_resolves' record_stores in .abcd/record-lint.json; a store added to that rule without the sentence moving would show it wrong again