A repository's committed .abcd/config.json can hand a role to a command-line runner (roles.<role>.runner: claude or opencode), so a checkout decides when the person's paid key is spent on its behalf; and the opencode runner is sealed only against plugins (--pure), so the repository's AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, opencode.json, project agents and skills still reach the run.

Frontmatter

.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2610020723185314-a-repository-s-committed-abcd-config.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗

mentions1

• dcn-26100500000000012026-10-05 — Release v0.13.0 is cut by the coordinating session abcd-d7 while the product thinker is away, and the run's agenda line is: approve the publish step. Under the product thinker's rulings of 2026-10-04 (~10:05Z, verbatim: "Yes, that order", to cut v0.13.0 now with the home rename #815 inside it and rename the folder on their return; "Yes, approve it", for the coordinating session to approve the GitHub publish deployment itself once every check has passed, then verify the downloads and the site; ~13:35, leaving overnight: "keep going autonomously so we can have a new release tomorrow morning"), the session approves the `release` environment's deployment of v0.13.0 only after the merge queue, the verify job and every other gate on the tagged commit report green, and stops with a handover instead if any does not. The cut: v0.13.0, impact breaking (decided by itd-2610030720038073, the home folder renamed to `~/.abcd.noindex` with every abcd entry point stopping until the person renames it; itd-2610030814013772, AGENTS.md the one conventions file; and iss-2610020723185314, only a personal route hands a role to a command-line runner), 55 records since v0.12.0: five shipped intents (two breaking, three additive: itd-201, itd-2610030810350727, itd-2610030821294016) and 50 resolved issues (41 fixes, one additive, one breaking, seven internal and outside the changelog); the release guard and the findings guard passed. The noindex intent's scan receipt (D6) was taken on a `.noindex` probe folder before the rename, with consent, and adr-2610030720195401 accepted with brief invariant 21 (6538ab4a). Brief fidelity: three tier-full reviews and their holds brought 25 brief sentences current before the close (9d57917c, 9e6e0aa0), and the guide's own review found one false sentence, corrected to say the rename is done in a plain Terminal (cde071b9, 405cf34d). Content commit c6441dc0, on top of 3a092b89, which the cross-check's one fix-before-tag finding required; both semantic gates ran at tier full over the first roll 317cd0cc, which differs from the content commit only by that commit and the re-cut CHANGELOG. The docs-currency-reviewer (Fable 5.1) found 2: dc-1 accepted as written (while only `~/.abcd` stands the plugin root holds no binary, so the hook refuses the rename too and the pages describe what the person meets), dc-2 a nitpick deferred to the next release notes. The brief-surface cross-check (45 pinned checkers, Opus 5.5, at most eight alive) found 144 (31 major, 94 minor, 19 nitpick), 143 valid and one invalid (x-036) on an independent classification (Fable 5.1); of the three user-facing findings x-065 (`abcd build --help` said the sub-agent ceiling is not counted, where it binds through `implement step` since ruling DR6) is fixed in 3a092b89, and x-010 and x-042 are minor and deferred; the 140 design-record findings go to the systematic brief pass iss-2609091956001547. Deferred out loud, to be captured after the tag as two records: `launch ship` reads the records at HEAD, so a spec close left uncommitted was silently missing from the cut rather than refused (the close was committed as 44a73e6f before the ingest), and `docs fidelity --apply` flags the drafted replacement while the landed sentence was hand-tidied, so .abcd/work/brief-review-flags.json carries the drafted wording for 10-docs, 15-prepare-this-repo, 22-site, 23-reading and 27-implement. Reason for deferring: neither changes what v0.13.0 ships, and the person's ruling was a release by morning.