The site's authorship tally counts the abcd label as an AI model: internal/core/site/contributors.go LoadAuthorship treats every Assisted-by value other than None as assistance, so a commit carrying Assisted-by: abcd:<version> (the label the implement loop's pick and sync commits carry under ruling PC1) is added to AssistedCommits, charted as a model bar named abcd:<version>, and adds abcd to the vendor set, and the comment at contributors.go:183 still calls None the only accepted non-vendor value. The label says abcd composed the text and no model wrote it, so publishing it under a heading that lists assisting models misstates the disclosure. Latent until the first loop commit lands on the default branch.

The site's authorship tally counts the abcd label as an AI model: internal/core/site/contributors.go LoadAuthorship treats every Assisted-by value other than None as assistance, so a commit carrying Assisted-by: abcd:<version> (the label the implement loop's pick and sync commits carry under ruling PC1) is added to AssistedCommits, charted as a model bar named abcd:<version>, and adds abcd to the vendor set, and the comment at contributors.go:183 still calls None the only accepted non-vendor value. The label says abcd composed the text and no model wrote it, so publishing it under a heading that lists assisting models misstates the disclosure. Latent until the first loop commit lands on the default branch.

Grounds

• pursued: a commit carrying the abcd label is never charted, never registers abcd as a vendor and never raises the disclosure rate, and the four commit-level figures partition the authored commits; a rendered contributors page showing an abcd:<version> bar, or a gate edit to ABCD_RE that TestComposedLabelGrammarMatchesTheGate does not catch, would show it wrong.