Development record

itd-2610030814013772 criterion A8 is evidenced only by a scripted claude -p receipt, not the person's fresh-session receipt its spec requires. The fidelity audit of 2026-10-04 judged A8 MET_WITH_CONCERNS: a dated receipt exists (2026-10-03, Claude Code 2.1.288, the canary word the canary word answered correctly), but it was taken with claude -p in print mode, which by the receipt's own stated limit cannot show whether the session called a tool to read AGENTS.md before answering, records no /memory line naming AGENTS.md, asks a different question from the spec's no-tool wording, and sits under receipts/ in a sibling worktree's local tier rather than at the .abcd/.work.local/logs/agents-md-canary-<date>.md path the spec's Approach names for this checkout. The canary's purpose is to show AGENTS.md was LOADED as instructions, which a print-mode answer cannot distinguish from a file read. The intent's Audit Notes already say the person's receipt was requested on 2026-10-04 and is outstanding; nothing in the ledger marked the gap until now.