Development record
The disembark probe's invariants, naming and personas sources ignore their own brief files, unlike open-questions and tradeoffs since the probe lane, and the pack's per-section file does not print a partial section's reason, which coverage.json and the text render now carry.
issueresolvedminoriss-2610072347247487
The disembark probe's invariants, naming and personas sources ignore their own brief files, unlike open-questions and tradeoffs since the probe lane, and the pack's per-section file does not print a partial section's reason, which coverage.json and the text render now carry.
Grounds
- pursued: a repository whose only signal for invariants, naming or personas is an authored brief file probes grounded for that section (a stub probes partial with a reason), and every partial section's packed brief file states its reason; TestNativeConstraintAndPersonaSectionsGroundFromTheirBriefFiles, TestPackSectionFileStatesWhyPartial and TestBriefSectionDocCleansItsPartialReason would fail if an adapter ignored its brief file or a packed partial omitted its reason
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610072347247487 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2610072347247487-the-disembark-probe-s-invariants-naming.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2610102343100369Once the drain lane for iss-2610072347247487 lands, the lifeboat probe grounds the personas section from an authored brief file, as it does every other human-owned section. The design record still predicts the old ceiling: the personas row of the lifeboat mapping Table (internal/core/lifeboat mapping.go, around line 151) and the generated mapping table in the brief's 00-meta.md say 'only partial there'. The probe now exceeds that on abcd's own tree, which has about 859 bytes of personas prose. Both of that lane's reviewers noted it as outside its remedy.