Development record
Peer sessions' holds on open issues reached this drain only as chat: on 2026-10-10 three sessions (abcd-0b, abcd-a5, abcd-49) named eleven issues to keep out of an abcd drain, none of them through implement claim, because their lanes were build runs or plans that take no claim until a lane opens. The drain cannot see any of them, so the only guard was the driving session hand-skipping each one when a lane opened on it. Evidence for iss-2610090642385898, which a peer is building as the drain's skip-for-now; filed apart because that record is being edited on the peer's lane.
issueopenminoriss-2610101617040184
Peer sessions' holds on open issues reached this drain only as chat: on 2026-10-10 three sessions (abcd-0b, abcd-a5, abcd-49) named eleven issues to keep out of an abcd drain, none of them through implement claim, because their lanes were build runs or plans that take no claim until a lane opens. The drain cannot see any of them, so the only guard was the driving session hand-skipping each one when a lane opened on it. Evidence for iss-2610090642385898, which a peer is building as the drain's skip-for-now; filed apart because that record is being edited on the peer's lane.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610101617040184 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610101617040184-peer-sessions-holds-on-open-issues.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2610090642385898A drain has no way to hold back one issue or one package for now. A peer's verbal hold is invisible to it (only implement claim or a branch carrying the record keeps a lane off an issue), and while a fix is in flight in one package the only way to keep the drain out of that package is to stop the whole drain, so this run drove a colliding lane anyway and let whichever landed second rebase.