Development record
Present-state planning prose still calls itd-2609091014076309 'the store draft' although the intent is in planned/: itd-148 (lines 64 and 188), spc-42 (lines 27 and 112) and iss-213 (line 11). The drift fix for iss-2610090744073409 corrected the CONCURRENCY rule, the build brief page and lane.go, and left these planning records as out of its remedy's scope; its ruthless review recorded them.
issueresolvednitpickiss-2610111926302792
Present-state planning prose still calls itd-2609091014076309 'the store draft' although the intent is in planned/: itd-148 (lines 64 and 188), spc-42 (lines 27 and 112) and iss-213 (line 11). The drift fix for iss-2610090744073409 corrected the CONCURRENCY rule, the build brief page and lane.go, and left these planning records as out of its remedy's scope; its ruthless review recorded them.
Grounds
- pursued: no present-state paragraph of itd-148, spc-42 or iss-213 calls the planned store intent a draft, and the extended test fails if one does; shown wrong by any 'store draft' or 'that draft' left outside a dated Deferral section of those records, or by the test passing on the pre-fix text (it failed there with 13 findings).
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610111926302792 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2610111926302792-present-state-planning-prose-still-calls.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions6
- iss-213Several agents sharing ONE git worktree silently invalidated a verification result and came close to losing committed work. Observed repeatedly during the 2026-08-11 install-test round, in a repo that is about to run more agents, not fewer.
- iss-2610090744073409The CONCURRENCY rule in .abcd/rules.json (and its AGENTS.md short form, if it repeats it) says the worktree store's own verbs are itd-2609091014076309, in drafts/, but that intent is in planned/; its link already points at planned/, so the prose contradicts the link beside it.
- iss-2610112237488013Three planning records still treat the worktree-store intent itd-2609091014076309's planning interview as owed, though it was held on 2026-09-30 (its record lists the rulings, and its Open Questions read 'None open'): spc-42's '## Blocked on' lists that interview as the blocker; iss-213's deferral_reason says 'Owed: the store draft's planning interview'; itd-148's Acceptance Criteria note and Open Questions defer to after it; and spc-42's Scope item 2 calls the check verb's name one of the store intent's open questions, though that intent's Decision 5 settled it as a sub-verb of ahoy. Found by the lane for iss-2610111926302792.
- itd-148Every change starts in its own worktree in abcd's store: the primary checkout is a read-only surface, and abcd blocks mutations there for every session but a declared coordinator
- itd-2609091014076309Session and agent worktrees live in a machine-scoped store that abcd lists and reclaims, never beside the user's own projects
- spc-42every-change-starts-in-its-own-worktree-the-primary-checkout