Development record
The brief at .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/10-docs.md:121-123 says: "The working verbs accept the `docs-lint.json` to load and the repo to work over; the bare citation parent only routes and takes neither." The shipped surface differs: Only the citation leaves take them: `abcd docs cite confirm` and `abcd docs cite refresh` carry --config and --root. The other working verbs under `abcd docs`, `fidelity` (flags --apply, --autonomous, --intent, --report) and `fidelity record` (flag --verdict-json), take neither, as the chapter's own generated appendix (lines 273-290) shows. The sentence holds for the cite sub-tree but is stated of the docs verb's working verbs generally. (v0.14.2 release crosscheck, false-claim, raised by opus in a09.)
The brief at .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/10-docs.md:121-123 says: "The working verbs accept the docs-lint.json to load and the repo to work over; the bare citation parent only routes and takes neither." The shipped surface differs: Only the citation leaves take them: abcd docs cite confirm and abcd docs cite refresh carry --config and --root. The other working verbs under abcd docs, fidelity (flags --apply, --autonomous, --intent, --report) and fidelity record (flag --verdict-json), take neither, as the chapter's own generated appendix (lines 273-290) shows. The sentence holds for the cite sub-tree but is stated of the docs verb's working verbs generally. (v0.14.2 release crosscheck, false-claim, raised by opus in a09.)
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610151422061013 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2610151422061013-the-brief-at-abcd-development-brief.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗