Development record
A drain's hand-backs and judgements live only in the checkout that made them: routeHandBack promotes the issue to an intent draft in that checkout, uncommitted, then the release pushes a tombstone so the issue reads free everywhere, and eligibility ignores related_intents, so every other account's drain judges or works the same issue again and promotes it to its own draft id.
issueresolvedmajoriss-2610161015370582
A drain's hand-backs and judgements live only in the checkout that made them: routeHandBack promotes the issue to an intent draft in that checkout, uncommitted, then the release pushes a tombstone so the issue reads free everywhere, and eligibility ignores related_intents, so every other account's drain judges or works the same issue again and promotes it to its own draft id.
Grounds
- pursued: no other account's drain judges, works or promotes an issue once one drain has handed it back or promoted it into an intent; a second account's drain reserving or asking a judgement over such an issue while its record is unchanged on origin's default branch would show it wrong
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610161015370582 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | resolved |
| severity | major |
.abcd/work/issues/resolved/iss-2610161015370582-a-drain-s-hand-backs-and-judgements-live.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-2610161016394967Drains on several accounts share the workrelated
mentions8
- dcn-26101610403655152026-10-16 — A drain's hand-backs are published on origin (facilitator-on-delegation, drain-many-accounts): a drain's hand-back, from a lane or from a judgement, is the release of the reservation the drain took before judging, carrying a closed-vocabulary hand-back kind and the blob id of the issue record on origin's default branch, never free text; a reservation a drain makes backs off such a tip while the blob is unchanged, while a person's own abcd reserve or abcd build is let through with a note; a promotion the checkout cannot make because it does not hold the record as origin does publishes the tombstone alone and says so; an issue whose related_intents names an intent is ineligible, a clause added to brief invariant 19; and every account draining at once runs one build, since an older build reads the tombstone as a plain release (grounds: reasoned tombstones as Cassandra and Kafka keep them, and the fixed-form rule for the shared remote, dcn-2610150000000001; iss-2610161015370582).
- dcn-26101614014491552026-10-16 — An issue an after-merge audit files is handed back as promoted (facilitator-on-delegation, drain-many-accounts step 4): the owed-check issue names its audited intent in related_intents, so the promoted rule of invariant 19 hands it back to that intent whatever its severity, and its check is paid through abcd intent audit rather than by a drain lane; this replaces the as-built note of dcn-2609300000000027 that an undecided audit's minor inconsistency is one the drain takes, which was the lane's reading and not part of ruling DQ1c, and keeps the rule field-only with no exception by source (grounds: the spec's wording for the rule, dcn-2610161040365515, and one rule over special cases; iss-2610161015370582)
- dcn-26101614122834502026-10-16 — A hand-back stands while origin's default branch holds the record at the blob its tombstone names (facilitator-on-delegation, drain-many-accounts): the claim package reads that blob from origin's default branch as last fetched, as an entity tag names the version a conditional request was made against; only a blob read there that differs lifts the hand-back, never an unreadable branch or a record held in no file or in several; a blob read from a branch the act's fetch could not refresh can only read as changed sooner than a fresh one; and a release asked to hand back a record the branch does not hold in exactly one file pushes a plain tombstone and says why rather than refusing, so the reservation never outlives the hand-back (grounds: entity tags and If-Match in RFC 9110 sections 8.8.3 and 13.1.1, and git's content-addressed object model; spc-2610161044461448 step 3; iss-2610161015370582).
- dcn-26101614122840182026-10-16 — Every issue lane's hand-back is published, and a drain judges a standing one from its view before it pushes (facilitator-on-delegation, drain-many-accounts): a lane of a run abcd build <iss-N> started publishes its kind as a drain's lane does, since the step's release already serves both and a hand-back names a person's decision whoever started the run; a drain move passes over a standing hand-back in its view, whichever copy made it, before any push or judgement, and the reservation it pushes still backs off one the view missed, which is the compare-and-swap; and a checkout holds a record as origin does when git's object name for its open file, as git hash-object stores it, equals origin's blob at the commit the move planned from, a promotion a killed call already made being found first (grounds: the view-then-compare-and-swap order of dcn-2610161040368890, and content-addressed equality as git defines it; spc-2610161044461448 step 3; iss-2610161015370582).
- dcn-26101614122874792026-10-16 — A hand-back tombstone names one of seven kinds and is read fail-closed (facilitator-on-delegation, drain-many-accounts): the kinds are the drain's four routed kinds (user-visible, trust-rule, design-finding, second-package), unachievable for a lane stopped after its fix rounds, which is the kind its route already names, stuck and closed, while no-found-at is left out because it never holds a reservation; a kind outside them, a record blob that is not one full lowercase object name, either trailer without the other, or either on a reservation that is not released, reads the tip as unreadable as every other malformed known trailer does, the writer refuses it before anything runs, and every reservation is measured against the longest such tombstone with a SHA-256 object name so it can always be handed back (grounds: closed-vocabulary, fail-closed parsing of input on a shared remote as language-theoretic security recommends, the reservation reader's existing rule for malformed trailers, and dcn-2610150000000001; spc-2610161044461448 step 3; iss-2610161015370582).
- dcn-26101614254965372026-10-16 — A record the consistency pass files is outside the drain's promoted rule (facilitator-on-delegation, drain-many-accounts step 4): the pass writes into related_intents the two intents its contradiction is between, which are the finding's subjects and not intents that took the work on, so under the promoted rule its record would be handed back for good, against the product thinker's ruling H12 as dcn-2609290000000016 records it, that an automatic filer's record is filed and a drain passes it over only until a person writes a real remedy; such a record is skipped while it carries the machine remedy and may be taken by a drain once a person writes one. The record is told by the three fields the filer writes, category inconsistency, source agent-finding and a found_during opening "abcd intent consistency, finding ", which no other filer in the binary writes, and not by finding_ref, which a record the pass filed before keys existed lacks. This narrows the "no exception by source" of dcn-2610161401449155 by this one filer: every other issue whose related_intents names an intent, the after-merge audit's owed-check issue included, is still handed back as promoted (grounds: ruling H12; the filer's own fields in internal/core/capture/consistency.go; iss-2610161015370582).
- dcn-26101614282444612026-10-16 — An after-merge audit's owed-check issue reaches a lane through a person's own build, and a drain still hands it back as promoted (facilitator-on-delegation, drain-many-accounts step 4; a new record refining dcn-2610161401449155, since records are append-only): ruling DQ1a, that an undecided fidelity audit reopens the work and sends the feature back to a lane, is subsumed by ruling DQ1c, which says what reopening means for a shipped intent (it stays shipped and flagged, and one issue carries the owed check, dcn-2609300000000027), so DQ1a is met when that issue reaches a lane, and a person's abcd build <iss-N> remains the lane route for it: the eligibility check lets a promoted issue through with a note naming its intent, as dcn-2610161040365515 lets a person's own build through a hand-back, while every other hand-back is still refused. This overrides the resolution of iss-2608290820473197 where it says the captured issue is one "which a drain can take": a drain hands it back, and a person's build or abcd intent audit takes it (grounds: rulings DQ1a and DQ1c, dcn-2610161040365515, dcn-2610161401449155; iss-2610161015370582).
- spc-2610161044461448drain-many-accounts