Development record
The mental model says principle-distiller extracts each spec's Modification Grammar into memory at spec completion; the library chapter says that extraction is not built
The mental model says principle-distiller extracts each spec's Modification Grammar into memory at spec completion; the library chapter says that extraction is not built
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/01-product/03-mental-model.md:93— "extracted byprinciple-distillerat spec completion into typed memory pages" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/07-library.md:413— "Not built: a curator role on theprinciple-distilleragent (the agent and the disembark sub-verb it feeds ship; this role does not), ingest and ask run reports, user-scope memory outside the repo, and the automatic extraction of a spec's modification grammar into the store at spec completion."
03-mental-model presents, as how the Modification gap is closed, that the itd-37 section is extracted by principle-distiller at spec completion into typed memory pages, while 07-library lists both the principle-distiller curator role and the automatic extraction of a spec's modification grammar at spec completion as not built.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 40.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262030459672 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262030459672-the-mental-model-says.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- itd-37Every Spec Externalises How It Should And Shouldn't Be Modified