Development record
The naming register says Role 2 verifies registration on every plan-review; the intent chapter runs Role 2 on demand only
The naming register says Role 2 verifies registration on every plan-review; the intent chapter runs Role 2 on demand only
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:155— "The Role 2 cross-document audit verifies registration on every plan-review." - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:614— "The judgement half runs on demand as the consistency sub-verb, host-delegated as the audit is"
04-naming relies on the Role 2 cross-document audit running on every plan-review to verify vocabulary registration, while 05-intent says Role 2's judgement runs on demand as the consistency sub-verb, with no aggregator and any hook wiring deferred. Nothing runs it at plan-review, so the registration check 04-naming counts on does not happen.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 48.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262030481186 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262030481186-the-naming-register-says-role-2-verifies.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2610262031090459The naming register relies on Role 2 to verify spec vocabulary registration at every plan-review, but Role 2 reads only the brief and the intents, through its own verb