The truth rule admits only shipped or decided staged machinery; the intent chapter keeps a staged audit-loop design it says was re-scoped away

The truth rule admits only shipped or decided staged machinery; the intent chapter keeps a staged audit-loop design it says was re-scoped away

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/00-meta.md:9 — "but never an undecided option: the brief records no proposals, no alternatives still under consideration, no aspirational maybes"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:578 — "This per-intent shape predates itd-50's 2026-09-21 re-scope, which makes the loop the last stage of abcd build rather than a per-intent mode"

00-meta says the brief records no proposals or undecided options, only shipped machinery or a staged target a future change builds toward, while 05-intent sets out the per-intent audit_mode loop as staged and says that shape predates itd-50's re-scope, which moved the loop into abcd build, with the rewrite owed. The passage describes a design the record no longer builds toward.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 58.