Invariant 19 lists every record filed before the remedy field as ineligible, but the drain reads such a record's suggested_fix as its remedy

Invariant 19 lists every record filed before the remedy field as ineligible, but the drain reads such a record's suggested_fix as its remedy

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/03-invariants.md:175 — "a record filed before that carries none and is listed as ineligible"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/35-drain.md:75 — "record written before the field existed reads its suggested_fix: as its remedy"

Invariant 19 states that a record filed before remedies were required carries none and is listed as ineligible. The drain chapter says such a record reads its suggested_fix: as its remedy, so a legacy record that has one can pass the remedy clause and be taken by a machine. The invariant's fixed disposition and the drain's fallback disagree about what happens to the same records.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 72.