The naming rule forbids `<verb> show` at design time, but the inbox chapter ships a show sub-verb and does not mark it as a gap

The naming rule forbids <verb> show at design time, but the inbox chapter ships a show sub-verb and does not mark it as a gap

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:100 — "<verb> show, <verb> stats, <verb> view and a plain unfiltered <verb> list are forbidden at design time"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/30-inbox.md:26 — "Showing one report by its id renders it whole, waiting or promoted."

The naming convention forbids <verb> show at design time instead of leaving it to review. The inbox chapter, designed after the rule, ships show as a sub-verb that renders one report by its id. Unlike the memory chapter, which marks its list as a gap against the rule, it presents show as conforming. The prohibition and the shipped name cannot both hold.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 74.