This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The press release puts `/abcd:run` operator-internal wiring in scope, but the surfaces index lists every registered verb and `run` is not among them

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262031058243

The press release puts /abcd:run operator-internal wiring in scope, but the surfaces index lists every registered verb and run is not among them

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/01-press-release.md:27 — "operator-internal command wiring (e.g. /abcd:run, the itd-29 autonomous-run operator surface"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/README.md:269 — "so the two tables together name every verb the binary registers apart from the framework's own help"

The press release's in-scope plumbing names operator-internal command wiring, giving /abcd:run (the itd-29 autonomous-run surface with status/pause/resume/preflight) as its example. The surfaces index says its two tables together name every verb the binary registers apart from the framework's help. Its operator-internal table holds only rules, spec, hook, completion and statusline. A run verb cannot be delivered scope and also missing from a register that claims to be complete.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 84.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262030301816. Same press release phrase about /abcd:run, set against a different statement that no run verb is registered.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262031058243
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

mentions3