The press release lists golden-test fixtures, a periodic SOTA audit and a self-improvement pre-flight as in-scope plumbing, but the prompt-quality chapter says those layers are staged

The press release lists golden-test fixtures, a periodic SOTA audit and a self-improvement pre-flight as in-scope plumbing, but the prompt-quality chapter says those layers are staged

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/01-press-release.md:27 — "a prompt-quality stack with golden-test fixtures, structural lint, periodic SOTA audit, prompt-version frontmatter, self-improvement pre-flight"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/05-prompt-quality.md:19 — "Layer C ships and is armed as a blocker; layers B and D are staged"

The press release lists, among the plumbing that makes abcd possible, a prompt-quality stack with golden-test fixtures, a periodic SOTA audit and a self-improvement pre-flight. None of them carries a staged marker. The prompt-quality chapter says only layer C (the linter) ships. Layer B (golden tests) and layer D (the SOTA audit) are staged, and the pre-flight is staged too. The brief's truth rule requires a staged claim to say so, so the two pages give different answers to what exists.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 86.