The press release's acceptance has capture write an issue file, but universal patterns calls capture (and intent and spec) a read-only render

The press release's acceptance has capture write an issue file, but universal patterns calls capture (and intent and spec) a read-only render

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/01-press-release.md:43 — "a structured issue at .abcd/work/issues/open/iss-N-<slug>.md exists with frontmatter populated and source provenance recorded"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/04-universal-patterns.md:90 — "capture, intent, guard, --version, rules, spec, identity and banlist are read-only renders"

The press release's acceptance criterion says /abcd:capture "<text>" leaves a structured issue file under .abcd/work/issues/open/. Universal patterns lists capture, intent and spec with lint, guard and banlist as read-only renders. A verb that writes a record into the ledger is not a read-only render.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 87.