The naming register ties the `review` bucket (a change judged) to family-1 verdicts, but the agent catalog says family 1 judges only lifeboats and the change reviewers' verdicts are not family 1

The naming register ties the review bucket (a change judged) to family-1 verdicts, but the agent catalog says family 1 judges only lifeboats and the change reviewers' verdicts are not family 1

A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:181 — "review compares a change against judgement (family-1 verdicts)"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/01-agents.md:236 — "They are each role's own words, not family 1: the ruthless reviewer's SHIP shares only its spelling."

The naming register defines the review bucket as comparing a change against judgement, with family-1 verdicts, and glosses that family ({SHIP, NEEDS_WORK, MAJOR_RETHINK}) as Carmack-style review verdicts. The agent catalog says family 1 assesses a packed lifeboat only, returned by lifeboat-reviewer to disembark review. It says the reviewers that judge a change state words of their own: ruthless-reviewer SHIP/FIX FIRST, security-reviewer APPROVE/BLOCK/NEEDS-INPUT. Those words are not family 1. So 'family-1 verdict' names change review on one page and lifeboat review on the other.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 94.