This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

02-context lists grill and ship as remaining intent design targets; the build sequence says there is no intent ship and no grill sub-verb, shipping running through spec close and grilling through the planning interview.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262031159277

02-context lists grill and ship as remaining intent design targets; the build sequence says there is no intent ship and no grill sub-verb, shipping running through spec close and grilling through the planning interview.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/02-context.md:11 — "with refine / grill / ship / shape remaining design targets"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/01-build-sequence.md:99 — "one or more specs — so there is no intent ship. There is no grill sub-verb"

02-context gives the intent command its sub-verbs 'with refine / grill / ship / shape remaining design targets' and describes ship as driving the spec to completion. The build sequence says an intent moves to shipped/ as the close-hook of abcd spec close, 'so there is no intent ship. There is no grill sub-verb', the grilling being the planning interview under itd-94. One document holds both verbs as designed and pending; the other holds the design settled without them.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 106.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262030322001. Same context sentence naming ship and grill as design targets, set against the build sequence's statement that neither exists.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262031159277
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

mentions3