07-memory says session memory is distilled via dev-sync memory as existing behaviour; 04-naming's register of every surface carries no dev-sync verb.

07-memory says session memory is distilled via dev-sync memory as existing behaviour; 04-naming's register of every surface carries no dev-sync verb.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:56 — "The remaining surfaces are exempt for the plain reason that no maritime cognate"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/07-memory.md:50 — "distilled by the internal/core/memory adapter via dev-sync memory"

07-memory makes the vendor memory directory a read-only harvest source and says session_memory pages are 'distilled by the internal/core/memory adapter via dev-sync memory', re-distilled on each sync. 04-naming registers every surface, maritime or exempt, so that an exemption is a decision rather than an omission, closing with 'The remaining surfaces are exempt for the plain reason that no maritime cognate' adds meaning, and no dev-sync appears anywhere in it. The memory chapter rests on a verb the naming register says abcd does not have.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 131.