Development record
itd-143 leaves the framing section's position and filename to its planning interview, while the product chapter already lists 06-framing.md
itd-143 leaves the framing section's position and filename to its planning interview, while the product chapter already lists 06-framing.md
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-143-the-brief-gains-a-framing-chapter-under.md:47— "The new section under01-product/(position and filename fixed at the" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/01-product/README.md:29— "[06-framing.md] (06-framing.md) | The macro-why home"
itd-143, still a draft, scopes a new section under 01-product/ whose position and filename are fixed at the planning interview. The product chapter's index already lists 06-framing.md as the macro-why home. Either the draft's scope is delivered while it sits on the uncommitted bench, or the brief records a section no planned work has fixed.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 155.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262031376538 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262031376538-itd-143-leaves-the-framing-section-s.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-143The brief gains a framing chapter under 01-product/ — the macro-why home: one section holds the project's framing, the why behind the why, and receives the brief-creation interview's committed framing products; the brief-lifeboat mapping gains the matching row so a lifeboat carries framing like any other sectionrelated
mentions1
- iss-2610262034068157draft itd-143 says the brief gains a framing chapter whose position and filename are still to be fixed; the capture surface's reframe reads that chapter's Construal section as a committed surface at a fixed path