The naming rules forbid a plain unfiltered `<verb> list`, but itd-2609091014076309 makes `abcd ahoy worktree list` render the same thing as the bare verb.

The naming rules forbid a plain unfiltered <verb> list, but itd-2609091014076309 makes abcd ahoy worktree list render the same thing as the bare verb.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:100 — "<verb> show, <verb> stats, <verb> view and a plain unfiltered <verb> list"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2609091014076309-session-and-agent-worktrees-live-in-a.md:44 — "Bare abcd ahoy worktree and abcd ahoy worktree list render the lane for this repository"

04-naming forbids <verb> show, stats, view and a plain unfiltered <verb> list at design time, because each only renames what the bare invocation already renders. The worktree-store intent has bare abcd ahoy worktree and abcd ahoy worktree list render the same lane, which is exactly the shape the rule forbids. Only --all changes the scope.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 176.