This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The brief-lifeboat mapping grounds the mental model partly from conventions, but itd-90 treats the mental model as a human-owned section.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262031493380

The brief-lifeboat mapping grounds the mental model partly from conventions, but itd-90 treats the mental model as a human-owned section.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/00-meta.md:63 — "product/mental-model | brief/01-product/03-mental-model.md | blank | partial | grounded"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-90-brief-interview-for-the-blanks.md:32 — "A human-owned section (personas, mental model) is presented as"

00-meta's generated mapping gives product/mental-model a partial grounding at tier 1, from docs explanation pages and ADR context sections. It singles out personas as the section that cannot be derived from a repository and is therefore human-owned (adr-36). itd-90 lists the mental model beside personas as a human-owned section to present as 'this is yours to write', a section the mapping says can be extracted.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 182.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. mapping.go marks mental-model human-owned while its table row still reads partial at tier 1; the two facts are orthogonal and 00-meta's personas paragraph names the sharpest case without denying the others.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262031493380
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions2