Scope says itd-29 is superseded, but itd-97 builds solo mode over the pluggable run seam it names as itd-29.

Scope says itd-29 is superseded, but itd-97 builds solo mode over the pluggable run seam it names as itd-29.

A sequencing impossibility (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/04-scope.md:19 — "itd-29 is superseded (by itd-2609201916151817, planned)"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-97-the-facilitator-is-a-mode-not-a-person.md:60 — "mode switch, over the pluggable run seam (itd-29)."

04-scope records itd-29 as superseded by itd-2609201916151817, and says no run verb is on any shipped surface. itd-97 builds solo mode's composed 'when' (scheduled sync, self-firing reviews, run initiation) 'over the pluggable run seam (itd-29)'. As written, that is a dependency on a record that will never deliver.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 181.