The mental model uses 'brief' for the project's canvas, but itd-2609201916151817 uses 'the brief' for the file an implementer is handed for one lane.

The mental model uses 'brief' for the project's canvas, but itd-2609201916151817 uses 'the brief' for the file an implementer is handed for one lane.

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/03-mental-model.md:3 — "the brief (what is this project?)"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2609201916151817-one-verb-takes-a-single-intent-from.md:44 — "The brief renderer: Intent, spec, the conventions section of AGENTS.md, the decision lines the intent cites, into one file the implementer is handed."

03-mental-model makes the brief the top layer of the record, the one that answers 'what is this project?'. itd-2609201916151817's brief renderer combines the intent, spec, AGENTS.md conventions and decision lines into one file the implementer is handed, and implement step returns 'the brief'. One name covers two artefacts, in a record that also refers to the project brief.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 184.