This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-7 depends on a dev-sync pre-pack step it calls 'already in brief'; the brief lists dev-sync only among out-of-scope work not yet under way.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262031537827

itd-7 depends on a dev-sync pre-pack step it calls 'already in brief'; the brief lists dev-sync only among out-of-scope work not yet under way.

A sequencing impossibility (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-7-rp-workspace-portability.md:38 — "dev-sync runs as a pre-pack step (already in brief)"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/01-press-release.md:33 — "scheduled dev-sync, opencode harness portability"

itd-7 hangs both its pull and its pack on dev-sync: the workspace is written on dev-sync, and 'dev-sync runs as a pre-pack step (already in brief)'. The brief's press release lists 'scheduled dev-sync' among the out-of-scope items that are not yet under way and live as draft intents, and describes the pack as three passes with no dev-sync step. As written, the planned intent depends on a verb and a pack step the brief records as unbuilt, and its claim that the step is already in the brief does not hold.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 191.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262034360121. Same End A (itd-7 line 38 claims dev-sync is already in the brief); the brief lists scheduled dev-sync as unbuilt and no dev-sync code exists.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262031537827
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions2