itd-147's press release says the generated appendix carries exit codes, schema fields and counts; invariant 18 says flags and sub-verbs only.

itd-147's press release says the generated appendix carries exit codes, schema fields and counts; invariant 18 says flags and sub-verbs only.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-147-the-brief-s-surface-chapters-are-a.md:24 — "sub-verbs, exit codes, schema fields and counts, derived from the command tree"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/03-invariants.md:173 — "The appendix carries flags and sub-verbs only: exit codes, output fields and behavioural claims stay prose and review-grain"

itd-147's press release says each surface chapter's generated block carries the verb's flags, 'sub-verbs, exit codes, schema fields and counts, derived from the command tree'. Invariant 18 states 'The appendix carries flags and sub-verbs only: exit codes, output fields and behavioural claims stay prose and review-grain'. The intent's own decisions narrow to flags and sub-verbs first, but its press release, the part a reader takes as the promise, still claims a wider shipped block than the invariant allows.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 193.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The press release states the end-state; the same intent's scope says exit codes and output fields stay prose until the binary records them, and the generator emits flags and sub-verbs only.