04-tradeoffs records /abcd:memory as the curated store's command with ingest/ask/lint; itd-39 says memory is now the agents' notes command and the store is reached through library.

04-tradeoffs records /abcd:memory as the curated store's command with ingest/ask/lint; itd-39 says memory is now the agents' notes command and the store is reached through library.

A naming conflict (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-39-scope-aware-memory-retrieval.md:78 — "Since the verb split, memory is the agents' notes command"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/03-evidence/04-tradeoffs.md:37 — "ship /abcd:memory command initially with ingest/ask/lint sub-verbs"

The memory-unification tradeoff records the choice to 'ship /abcd:memory command initially with ingest/ask/lint sub-verbs'. itd-39 says 'Since the verb split, memory is the agents' notes command' and that the store is reached as library ingest, library ask and library lint. The name memory now refers to two different commands in the corpus, and the tradeoff entry carries no note that the verb was split.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 198.